Agent and workflow traceability
Can you follow which agent acted, on which workflow, and what it actually did?
Primary offer
Agent Traceability Assessment
One consequential workflow. One real agent run. Whether it can be reconstructed against the authority in force at the time, and checked against the system of record.
Who it is for
Teams putting consequential agents into production now
The Assessment is for organizations that already have — or are about to deploy — an AI agent inside a workflow where the outcome matters: tax, payments, energy, aerospace, or another regulated or high-stakes process.
You already have security, identity, and governance. The assessment asks whether one real run can be bound to the business authority then in force, and whether the system of record matches what the platform reported.
Why now
Operationalize first, and the evidence question becomes a rebuild
Enterprises are embedding AI agents into consequential workflows now. If they operationalize before deciding how actions, authority, policy, continuity and outcomes will be independently evidenced, they may later redesign permissions, workflows, integrations and evidence capture.
You cannot reconstruct what you never captured. Weaveframe helps identify those gaps before the agentic workflow becomes infrastructure.
What Weaveframe examines
Six questions that decide whether the record will hold
This is not a governance assessment. It reconstructs one cross-system run and shows where independent proof breaks.
Authority and approval continuity
Can you show the business mandate and approvals in force for that run, not only what the agent was configured to do?
Governing policy and version
Can you bind the action to the policy that was in force at the time — not the policy that exists now?
Evidence availability and provenance
Does independent evidence exist, and can you show where it came from?
Authoritative system-of-record verification
Does the ERP, ledger, bank, or other system of record match what the platform reported?
Architectural rework risk
Which gaps would later force a redesign of permissions, workflows, integrations, or evidence capture?
What you receive
A scoped finding on one consequential workflow
A written finding on one workflow: what of the run can be reconstructed, whether it stayed inside the authority then in force, where the platform’s reported outcome and the system of record diverge, and where independent proof breaks.
The Assessment is not a platform deployment and not a consulting retainer. It is a first, concrete look at whether the workflow you are about to operationalize can later be proven.
What happens next
One workflow. A conversation. A written finding.
Request the Assessment with the workflow you have in mind. Weaveframe reviews fit, scopes the engagement to that workflow, and returns a written finding.
Teams that are already putting a consequential agent into production, and want to help shape the platform, can also explore the Design Partner Program.
Request
Assess an Agentic Workflow
Tell us the workflow. We will follow up if it is a fit for a scoped Agent Traceability Assessment.